On May 27, 2008, at 3:43 PM, Andrew Freedman wrote:
kate provided the following information on 28/05/2008 5:21 AM:
The alt tag which is'nt really the right discription is really
called the attribute tag.
Kate
Patrick H. Lauke also provided the following information on
28/05/2008 5:33 AM:
or...the alt attribute, if you want to correct people...
That's all well and good and I for one thank you for clarifying
that but how does that answer Tom's query?
Andrew.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
Really! Is there anyone on this list who doesn't understand the
distinction between 'tag' and 'attribute'. And does anyone seriously
not understand what is meant when reference is made to the 'alt tag',
or to HTML 'code' rather than 'markup'?
I would certainly agree that in the context of a lecture on the
subject these distinctions are important. But in the context of
discussions on this list I think this is taking semantic hair-
splitting to unwarranted extremes, especially if, as Andrew points
out, it doesn't accompany some effort to respond to the question at
hand.
I move that henceforth it should be acceptable here to use 'tag' as
shorthand for 'attribute' and 'code' for 'markup'.
Andrew
http://www.andrewmaben.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In a well designed user interface, the user should not need
instructions."
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************