Maybe we need the correct person from AGIMO on this list. Having said that the spec is probably based on Word up to 2003, which is the version most Departments would be using, I don't believe Vista has been released as a SOE to any Federal Government Department as yet.
Cheers, Rae On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Matthew Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rae Buerckner wrote: > >> The following is from the AGIMO website. >> [...] >> The preferred format is HTML, followed by Word/RTF, and text. >> > > They should change this from "Word" to "doc" (because Word 2007 also > includes docx and so "Word" is ambiguous). > > And obviously they should specify the version of doc (if they don't > already) such as doc as implemented in MS Word '97. > > As with PDF they should encourage the most widely understood version of the > format... with some exception to the rule for features only available in > later versions of the format (Eg, for accessibility use Microsoft Office > 2010, don't use RTF). > > > > -- > .Matthew Holloway > http://holloway.co.nz/ > > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
