Flaming is definitely off topic!

On Fri, June 6, 2008 9:38 am, Ted Drake wrote:
> Damn, this is refreshing to hear for a change! Enough said.
> Ted
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Mark Harris
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 9:13 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Breadcrumbs showing organisational structure and
> usability
>
> libwebdev wrote:
>
>> My organisation manages around 7000+ pages for 100s of departments,
>> using a CMS. Mine is the only department outside the CMS, just because
>> we can.
>>
>> We have been persuaded (read: bullied) to redesign our header to
>> exactly match that of the parent organisation. I have no problem with
>> that per se, but theirs includes breadcrumbs, and we don't want 'em.
>>
>
> Who pays your bills? Golden Rule is that the guy with the gold makes the
> rules. Suck it up. "Because we can" is not a valid reason to do
> anything. You are part of the organization, yes? Therefore you should
> fit within its structures and strictures, whether you like that or not.
> If they are wrong, document it and prove it, otherwise it sounds like
> petulance to me.
>
>
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************
>
>




*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to