Very good advice Rob.

Rob Enslin wrote:
Hi Jason,

Why don't you turn the convincing angle up-side-down? Instead of pulling the 'accessibility' pitch focus on the performance and customizability of having a CSS-driven navigation (accessibility will follow naturally).

Perhaps you could prepare two versions of a similar looking navigation (one image one css) and run a performance test. Show the results and hopefully convince your client to choose wisely?

Only a thought.

Rob

2008/8/27 Jason Pruim <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>

    Good Morning everyone!

     I have a client that wants me to write his navigation mostly as a
    picture and then use image maps to get to the actual links.

    I am wondering, how would I go about convincing my client that this
    isn't the best way to do it? I personally think that some nice text
    links, styled properly with CSS would look just as good if not
    better then image maps.

     Oh, and to put it into context, it's a picture rating site so I
    don't know that Blind users are going to be too much of a concern
    for him since they can't see what the main part of the site is for.

    Any info I could get about this would be wonderful!

    Thanks everyone!

    --

    Jason Pruim
    Raoset Inc.
    Technology Manager
    MQC Specialist
    11287 James St
    Holland, MI 49424
    www.raoset.com <http://www.raoset.com>
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>






    *******************************************************************
    List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
    Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
    Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
    *******************************************************************




--
/ Rob Enslin
/ enslin.co.uk <http://enslin.co.uk>
/ twitter.com/robenslin <http://twitter.com/robenslin>
/ +44759 052 8890

*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.6/1627 - Release Date: 2008/08/22 06:48 AM



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to