On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:24 AM, David Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3 Sep 2008, at 13:08, Todd Budnikas wrote: > >> >> On Sep 3, 2008, at 6:19 AM, David Storey wrote: >> >>> >>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 11:42, tee wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Sep 3, 2008, at 2:36 AM, David Storey wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 3 Sep 2008, at 11:28, Regnard Raquedan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Well, if it's akin to Safari, then it's as good as testing it there, >>>>>> right? :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Or is it...? >>>>> >>>>> No, it has a different JavaScript engine, and doesn't support a number >>>>> of things the regular WebKit supports, such as text-shadow, @font-face >>>>> and a >>>>> few others. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>> Does it support border-radius or -webkit-radius? >>> >>> no browsers support border-radius. It does support >>> -webkit-border-radius, as far as I know (I'm running on Mac and parallels >>> doesn't work on my 64-bit Vista, and I can't be bothered to do the few hours >>> re-install process of Vista) >> >> -webkit-border-radius renders just fine. Running Chrome on XP on VMWare >> Fusion. http://www.css3.info/preview/rounded-border/ > > Without WebKit's anti-aliasing as far as I can tell from Twitter posts. I'm > wondering if this is due to webkit using platform specific code for things > like this and text-shadow, as being a reason why they are not in Chrome > (Safari on Windows has a compatibility layer), or if it is a older branch. > I'm thinking more the former. >
Could someone tell me if it has Google Download Accelerator or other Google Toolbar features built in? I'm just wondering how much is under the hood... -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.net ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
