Quite sure this was written when xhtml seemed to be the only way forward
as xhtml 2 was the only thing being developed.
Things change.
fry
Christian Montoya wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:28 PM, rch lib <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I took a look at that Drew Mclellan article. He says:
"Step 3: Future-proof your site with XHTML
HTML has reached the end of its life and is no longer being developed as a
mark-up language. Its replacement is Extensible HTML (XHTML)—an
implementation of XML that works in all browsers, old and new. Even though
XHTML is strict XML, its tags and attributes are so similar to HTML that
old browsers do not spot the difference. Using XML is advantageous because
it's a modern, future-proof standard."
Is that correct??
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet!
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
