Okay. That makes sense. -- Brett P.
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM, David Dorward <da...@dorward.me.uk> wrote: > Brett Patterson wrote: > > So, my question is this. Why does the image tag have to have the border > > placed on it, instead of placing the border or text-decoration styles on > > the anchor tag? > > Consider the case: > > <a href="/"> <img src="/foo" alt=""> Ipsum Ipsum </a> > > A border around the entire thing would give a very different effect to a > border around just the image. > > There's no selector in CSS to select an element based on its descendants > either. > > -- > David Dorward <http://dorward.me.uk/> > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org > ******************************************************************* > > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
