On 2009/04/30 21:43 (GMT+1000) Mathew Robertson composed:
> This argument is circular, either a) the company has the coders available
> to create the IE6-specific tool and thus can upgrade the tool to use a
> later version of the browser, or b) they dont have coders and thus they
> couldn't have developed the IE6-specific product.
Or, they had access to coders who provided them only binaries without source
code, and those coders are no longer available, with the result that the
custom application would have to be rewritten from scratch by other coders to
work properly with other browsers. This scenario is a common price one pays
for dependence on closed source software.
--
"He who works his land will have abundant food, but the
one who chases fantasies will have his fill of poverty."
Proverbs 28:19 NIV
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [email protected]
*******************************************************************