This straight OL does not work from a pure XHTML 1.0 Strict perspective unless your legal documents conform to the browsers' default list numbering scheme. The *'type'* attribute is not valid in XHTML 1.0 which really annoys me to no end, since I work for a county government. The numbering in a legal document is an integral part of the pages' content and should not be left to the determination of the CSS, because once you separate the CSS from the XHTML the list's numbering is not valid and much of the use and meaning for the document is lost.
I am not sure, but I expect that HTML5 has a similar issue. Correct me if I am wrong. I hope I am. Jim On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 08:16, Jason Grant <ja...@flexewebs.com> wrote: > This isn't a problem at all. It's a simple thing to do in HTML. Example: > <ol> > <li>Blah Blah</li> > <li>Blah Blah</li> > <li>Blah Blah > <ol> > <li>Blah Blah</li> > <li>Blah Blah</li> > <li>Blah Blah > <ol> > <li>Blah blah</li> > <li>Blah blah</li> > <li>Blah blah</li> > </ol> > </li> > </ol> > </li> > </ol> > > Thanks, > > Jason > ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
