And Google, being the special company that it is breaks that rule also by having the very first ever page they coded for Google searches also being the crap that they are today. :-) Some things never change.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 12:48 AM, l-user <[email protected]> wrote: > Jason wrote: > > >It's because the YouTube guys have no clue about semantics. > > Clark's Law: The bigger the company, the worse the code. > > http://blog.fawny.org/2007/11/28/googletags/ > > It's the same at google. Actually, it's more like they do know about it, > they just don't care. People like that are extremely dismissive about html. > It can be written very sloppily and still display correctly, so why bother? > html is for amateurs, they write with real code, stuff that matters. They > think it hysterically funny that we go to any trouble to write clean, > semantic html. > > l-u. > > > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [email protected] > ******************************************************************* > -- Jason Grant BSc, MSc CEO, Flexewebs Ltd. www.flexewebs.com [email protected] +44 (0)7748 591 770 Company no.: 5587469 www.flexewebs.com/semantix www.twitter.com/flexewebs www.linkedin.com/in/flexewebs ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] *******************************************************************
