On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Patrick H. Lauke <[email protected]> wrote: > It really just depends on what you're trying to do though.
Precisely, and the IE hit certainly pales into insignificance compared to the benefits for us. We run a lot of sites, an awful lot of pages, and an awful lot of visitors. Any resources - even the Uni logo in the corner - that can be shared effectively are going to make a substantial difference. Our current style sheets have absolute URLs to these shared graphics, which caused 'mixed content' problems in secure environments. > shared assets between http and https versions that are cached > even when moving from insecure to secure. I actually expect to see a cached version of each, not a single, shared object. We'll be doing a bit more testing, but at this stage, it looks like a thumbs up for our situation. Thanks again to all who contributed. -- Andrew Harris [email protected] http://www.woowoowoo.com ~~~ <*))))>< ~~~ ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [email protected] *******************************************************************
