Does anyone have any thoughts on the best way to handle mobile versions of content? Specifically arguments for and against how the BBC handles different formats - including mobile, simply by appending a format type to the end of a canonical url. Ie. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007rsj5 is the base url http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007rsj5.mp is the mobile version http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007rsj5.xml is the same data in xml format http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007rsj5.rdf is the rdf representation of the data
VS the generally accepted alternative to doing mobile which is to provide a different domain, such as mob. Or m. Ie. http://m.smh.com.au/ http://m.abc.net.au/ Anyone have any thoughts on pros/cons of the two methodologies? Just curious to see if anyone else has implemented the BBC method? Cheers, Sam Dwyer Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and may contain legally privileged or copyright material. It is intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are not permitted to disseminate, distribute or copy this email or any attachments. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. The ABC does not represent or warrant that this transmission is secure or virus free. Before opening any attachment you should check for viruses. The ABC's liability is limited to resupplying any email and attachments. ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: memberh...@webstandardsgroup.org *******************************************************************
