Andre,
I believe you can only get the performance advantage of local interface from within a single jar/ear (within the same class loader). This is a J2EE restriction of local interfaces. That's why you would need to put the WSIF implementation in the deployment package of the things you were calling. In other words, the gating factor on use of local interfaces is J2EE.
--Bill
| Andre Tost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07/11/2003 10:38 AM
|
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: local EJB interfaces? |
Is there a plan to support local interfaces? Aren't we missing out on the
performance advantage if I always have to go through the remote interface?
I guess you could view a service as something "remote". But the benefits of
local interfaces are too big to miss out on them, aren't they?
Andre Tost
"Owen D
Burroughs" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
> Subject: Re: local EJB interfaces?
07/11/2003 10:51
AM
Please respond to
wsif-user
Andre,
The EJB provider shipped with WSIF is currently designed only to deal with
remote EJB interfaces and so unless you were to write your own provider to
do so, the answer is currently no.
Regards,
Owen
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Andre |
| | Tost/Rochester/IB|
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| | |
| | 10/07/2003 23:28 |
| | Please respond to|
| | wsif-user |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: local EJB interfaces?
|
|
|
|
|
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Is there a way to use local EJB interfaces with WSIF?
Andre Tost
