R2D2 wrote:

The nightly build did clear things up a bit. There is
a problem when deserializing the response object.
There is a  problem however.. most posts do take this
into consideration but the xml response which they are
trying to serialize is simplistic... no attributes,
CDATA sections etc...[e.g. the Cdyne ziptogeo ws].
So I am in a fix again.
make sure to report it as feature request to AXIS jira - with good use case (wsdl!) that greatly enhances chances of that getting working in (some) future!

BTW we use XMLBeans to create the request and response
beans. What I am trying to figure out is how to fix
this[xmlbeans request response files - jarrred
appropriately] into the WSIF framework ? Any
ideas/tips ?
i have implemented (subset of) WSIF API (with extensions to support server side as well) on top of XmlBeans-compatible lightweight SOAP/XML runtime - check http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/xgws/xsul/guide/ (it is under Apache-like license) - i hope that this can be one of pieces to consider when discussing next generation WSIF (when it happens ...)

HTH,

alek

--
The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay

e>
</blockquote>
i have implemented (subset of) WSIF API (with extensions to support
server side as well) on top of XmlBeans-compatible lightweight SOAP/XML
runtime - check http://www.extreme.indiana.edu/xgws/xsul/guide/ (it is
under Apache-like license) - i hope that this can be one of pieces to
consider when discussing next generation WSIF (when it happens ...)<br>
<br>
HTH,<br>
<br>
alek <br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="103">-- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
</pre>
</body>
</html>

Reply via email to