Christian Kloner wrote: > hi, > > why do you think, that Axis2 Java has no support for dynamic > invocation? The thing is, if you use the RawXmlMessage Handler for > sending and receiving messages, you can construct with Axiom any SOAP > message and send it through the net to any destination. I also used it > in my workflow project and created an own invocation API around it. if > you are interested in it, i can manage to give you access to it. > > WSIF was a fine project, but i think it is a bit outdated. I used it > in my invocation api 2 years ago but the problem was, that i had to > invoke web services really dynamically without having any java object > to deserialize xml to. as i know, for every xml message, you need to > register a java object to deserialize to. but what is, if you don't > have any java class compiled for the receiving xml message... please > tell me, if I am not correct and WSIF now supports a really dynamic > approach for complex datatype handling. thanks. chris,
at some stage you need to do /some/ type handling - depending on workflow lang and how you use it you may get away with xpath expressions and no types validation - the value WSIF could add if you invoke not just XML web service but anything that can be described in WSDL so workflow interacts with services using common abstraction (WSDL and WSIF API) best, alek > > > > > Clifford Audinet wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a project that has several requirements related to dynamic >> invocation of web services using SOAP and async messaging using JMS. >> Our product is written in C and so initially I thought that using the >> new Axis2/C implementation might be the way to go as it supports client >> side dynamic invocation of web services. >> >> However, there are some clear benefits in implementing the web >> services client in Java. This led me to look at the Axis2 Java >> implementation which doesn't have support for dynamic invocation. That >> lead me to the WSIF project which appears to meet my requirements. So a >> couple of questions: >> >> 1) It looks like the last release was 2003 and that there was a release >> planned for 2006. Is that release still planned? >> 2) As I will be going through the samples over the next couple of days >> is it advisable to pull the source for bug fixes, etc that occurred post >> 2003 release? >> >> Thank you for your time, >> >> Cliff >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
