Ahmet Emre wrote:
>
> We are starting to use some web services first time in our company.
>  There were few web service calls we had developed in the past and we
> were using WSIF. Now we do expect more and more web service calls
> being made and we do expect web services becoming an important part of
> the architecture in a year or so.
>
> How do you guys see WSIF in the future? In order to invoke Web
> Services do you believe WSIF is the way to go? Or would you say WSIF
> is legacy and focus on something else? As I researched little bit,
> WSIF community is not very active anymore.
yes that is correct but the level of activity is depending on
contribution of anybody interested (and if there are many open issues
worked on which is not the case nowadays).

i think WSIF has many strong points and it provides an excellent level
of abstraction of "service" by using WSDL and it should stay around for
long time :)

from my side i posted release candidates but i did not get much of
feedback - if the latest RC is good we may vote to have it released as
official new version of WSIF

as of future i would like to see AXIS2 provider added/tested to WSIF and
maybe make a new version with the same API but some improvements, such
as adding support for WSDL2, better and more flexible XML-Java data
binding/mapping,  and more async with WS-Addressing, and anything that
is people find useful and time to contribute ;)

best,

Alek


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to