> I keep making the proverbial "one more change", but this needs to stop > somewhere. I've bumped the version number to 1.3, and I'm now proposing > that we release v1.3 r3673 as the next "full release" of WSJT-X. > > A windows package has posted at > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_130r3673.exe (snip)
With the bump in the version number a new v1.3 desktop icon was created ... but in the Windows start menu the wsjtx1.3 link was put in the wsjt1.2 folder. (Took all the defaults walking through the Windows installer.) And it looks like everything installed to the c:\wsjt1.2 folder. What is the scheme for version naming and how the executable, directories and start menu folders should be setup? I guess my personal preference would be that minor versions shouldn't create new folder structures - and maybe not even be named differently. (You can always get the version and build from the window title bar as well as "about".) Unrelated - installer places shortcuts in the desktop folder. My preference would be for the installer to ask permission to do that. The trend beginning with Windows Vista and Windows 7 was to have application installers not create desktop icons. Bob W1QA _______________________________________________ Wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/wsjt-devel
