On 07/11/2014 21:13, KI7MT wrote: > Hi Bill, Hi Greg, > > I saw you posted the v1.2 binaries, thanks for that. I'll update the > KVASD Installer app accordingly. OK, they are not complete yet. The Mac ones probably need work. The Linux ARM one is still v1.11. > > Suggestion. Using the Files / Folder section on WSJT SF seems to be a > good place for housing files such as these, as there's no real revision > control possible with the binaries, apart from the names themselves. You > can create as many or few folders as needed. Each upload automatically > gets an MD5 and SHA1 hash with the upload. I disagree on revision control but having them in a separate branch from any tools that fetch them would not work well.
I was discussing earlier with John G4KLA about what we need to do to deliver kvasd on Mac, it is also slightly complex as it needs to be dynamically linked due to LGPL restrictions and needs to be hooked up with the libraries we bundle with WSJT-X. I am contemplating a CMake project to build a kvasd installer using CPack so we can get some platform neutrality rather than rolling different solutions for each and every platform - it may not be worth the effort though given the probable very slow rate of change in kvasd. > > I think you have to be in the Admin group to manage the folders & > Uploads though. That would not be an issue although I think my preference is checking them in, on balance. > > If you add your pub SSH key to your SF user name, one can scp / rsync > the files directly to a folder location. In the case of rsync, mirror > what you have at home to the server in one simple step. Does anyone actually use SF for development without adding their public keys to the the server? I would very soon get sick of typing passwords! > > Just a couple thoughts. > 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
