On 02/07/2015 06:43 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > I disagree. For example the JT65 decoder and the JT9 decoder are pretty > much independent and there is virtually no contention between them. This > means that they can be run in parallel on two CPUs with little or no > overhead for distributing them across the two CPUs. That means that give > equal amounts of work it is possible to deliver the decoding results in > almost half the time compared to running them sequentially.
I'm sorry. You are probably right, Bill. I should not consider the world in an too egocentric manner. Hi ! Best 88 de Claude ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
