Bill Somerville <g4wjs@...> writes:

> 
> Hi All,
> 

Hi Bill -

> some time back the message generation was changed to help those with 
> type 2 compound call signs. Details are here:
> 
> (snip)
> 
> Summarizing for a caller with a type 2 compound call sign:
> 
> CQ TI4/N0URE EK70
>                                         N0URE G4WJS IO91
> G4WJS N0URE -05
>                                         N0URE G4WJS R-15
> G4WJS N0URE RRR
>                                         N0URE G4WJS 73     (Also see 
below)
> DE TI4/N0URE 73
> 
> and for an answerer with a type 2 compound call sign:
> 
> CQ G4WJS IO91
>                                           N0URE G4WJS EK70
> N0URE G4WJS -15
>                                           DE TI4/N0URE R-05

This is very intriguing.  I'm sure that this form for the R+dB message 
would help the "distant end" realize that his QSO partner has a compound 
call sign.

> N0URE G4WJS RRR
>                                           DE TI4/N0URE 73
> N0URE G4WJS 73                                              (Also see 
below)
> 
> with both ends having type 2 compound call signs:
> 
> CQ TI4/N0URE EK70
>                                            N0URE W9XYZ FN75
> W9XYZ N0URE +05
>                                            DE W9XYZ/VE1 R+02
> W9XYZ N0URE RRR
>                                            DE W9XYZ/VE1 73
> DE TI4/N0URE 73
>
> (snip)
> 
> I would appreciate comments and testing please. Mac and Linux versions 
> on request.
> 

Having and signing a type 2 compound call sign, I can say that this is a 
step forward. Too often, QSO partners get a big surprise if and when they 
pay attention to the "73" response. Other than that, most don't have a clue 
about the call sign.

Hopefully, this "upgrade" to procedure will lessen the number of stray eQSL 
cards and other QSL/LotW requests that are directed to my call sign without 
the type 2 compound attributes. Have to reject them and ask them to 
resubmit directly to my compound call sign. Some do, some don't, some are 
happy, some are.....

Now, if we can get those about to answer the CQ of a station with a type 2 
compound call sign to just double-click on the call sign and let the 
software do the work, instead of trying to answer the CQ with a hashed up 
13 character free message that won't load properly into the CQ caller's 
software upon double-click (requiring the CQ caller to either respond with 
a free message himself or use some ingenuity to work around the problem). 

> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.
> 

Thanks, Bill

Paul  DU2/WA8UGN

> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, 
sponsored
> by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub 
for all
> things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership 
blogs to
> news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
> conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> 





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to