On 15/03/2015 01:35, richard stanley wrote:

Hi Richard,
> I have had several qso's this evening using 5056 both calling cq and
> answering cq calls and the double clicking the sent text for a reply worked
> fine as did the log input but all calls were standard calls.
Thanks for the testing and feedback.
>
> The 1 thing I noticed was I started to call cq but got distracted a station
> replied and I never noticed, while tx was still enabled it did not send a
> 2nd cq it waited for me to reply so it missed a minute, normally it would
> continue to call cq, I noticed after the station called me twice and the qso
> went ahead as normal.
I have not yet been able to reproduce this behaviour. Can you remember 
how you initiated the CQ call?
>
> Richard m0clz
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Somerville
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 7:26 PM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: automatic processing of received
> messagesenhancements
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have just committed the second phase of my changes related to compound
> callsigns to the development branch. Here is the commit message:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r5055 | bsomervi | 2015-03-14 19:13:18 +0000 (Sat, 14 Mar 2015) | 21 lines
>
> Improved automatic message handling
>
> More consistent and accurate processing of compund callsigns including
> recognizing the  user's call  in both base  and fully  qualified form,
> extracting reports  from special type  one and type two  compound call
> messages.  Ensure that  "CQ DX"  message prefixes  are recognized and
> processd correctly.
>
> The  cycle of  double  clicking through  a QSO  has  been enhanced to
> recognoize the  standard messages correctly  and use the  correct next
> message. The automatic  transmission button "Enable Tx"  now does what
> it says and does not double as a stop transmit button. This allows the
> current transmission  to complete  even if the  automatic transmission
> feature is  disabled. In line with  this the "stop sending  after a 73
> message is sent"  feature turns off the  automatic transmission enable
> at the start of the sending of  a 73 message and also the next message
> is now set up as the CQ  message automatically in this scenario.  A 73
> message is now  either a standard message containing the  word "73" or
> any free text  message containing "73" (not necessarily  as a distinct
> word").
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This change is a fairly radical reworking of the way incoming messages
> are parsed and the actions taken when messages are double clicked in the
> activity windows. It should handle QSOs by and with compound callsign
> holders far better than previously and has other benefits for all QSO types.
>
> I strongly recommend that testers experiment with using double clicks in
> the activity to progress their QSOs and report back any incorrect
> behaviour of the application.
>
> With these changes I find that having the settings "Double-click on call
> sets Tx enable" and "Disable Tx after sending 73" both checked makes the
> QSO process extremely smooth using just double-clicks on calls and
> responses, only having to revert to specific clicks and typing when I
> want to send a free text message or if my QSO partner sends an out of
> sequence message.
>
> If you are testing these changes; please double check that, when you
> come to log the QSO, the callsign, the report sent and received have
> been correctly transferred to the "Log QSO" pop up dialog.
>
> 73
> Bill
> G4WJS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored
by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all
things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to
news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the 
conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to