I too think the waterfall in it's current configuration is confusing and a bit unwieldly.
What I would like to see is the bins/pixel control go away and be replaced by a Stop control. The frequency spread would then be controlled by the Start and Stop controls. Resizing the window should do that, and only that, i.e. resize the window. The bins/pixel becomes an internal calculation. Doing that would make the window monitor independant and each user can set things up that best match their combination of radio bandwidth and monitor width. The initial defaults should be about 500 Hz to 4 KHz with a width of about 1000 pixels, which should display on any monitor, including laptops, from the last decade or so. Bill, this is where some of the confusion arises with those new to the mode (I'm still learning). I now use the WSJT-X waterfall after Mikes help, now that I realise its importance. The thing is that you mention the default bandwidth and then a suitable bins/pixel setting as two different things. When I adjusted the bins/pixel setting here I also increased the waterfall bandwidth. I was not aware that some of the waterfall settings did not just alter the display, but configured WSJT-X too. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
