Hi Joe, thank you for your answer.
> The second sentence of the section from which you quote advises the > interested user to read the full detailed description of the protocol in > a paper published in the ARRL journal QEX: > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/JT65.pdf > You will find the description you are looking for at the top of page 8. You are right. The only reason why I spoke about the potential documentation update is that also the original paper speaks about the rounded value 2.6917 while the precise value is 11025/4096, which indicates a nice relationship between the symbol duration and the frequency step (equal to the symbol rate). > Incidentally, the right-parenthesis in your expression > "1270.5 + (11025/4096) × (2 + N × m) Hz" > is misplaced. Your formula should read > "1270.5 + (11025/4096) × (2 + N) × m Hz" My fault. In fact, the most illustrative way to show how the frequency is calculated is to define a frequency step: Δf = (11025/4096) × m Then the symbol tone frequency is: 1270.5 + Δf × (2 + N) Everything is clear now. Thank you Tomáš OK2TKB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
