On 16/04/2015 15:13, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
Would it be a good idea to make the clicking on the waterfall select
JT65/9 based on the split bar?
So if you click above it JT9 is auto-selected and below JT65 is
selected? Wouldn’t that be the common case?
Common but not exclusive. Technically the only upper limit on JT65 is
the passband of the receiver. It could be argued that those using
software other then WSJT-X have no knowledge of JT9 or of any upper
limit to JT65 operation.
It would be nice if all JT65 activity were below some agreed frequency
as it does cause the JT9 decoder some difficulty, it may be that is the
fault of the JT9 decoder rather than the JT65 only operator.
Another issue is that the separator is moveable.
I seem to see a few JT65's occurring in the +2kHz window which may be
a mistake.
And I have, more than once, intended to do JT9 only to realize JT65 is
selected a bit too late.
Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
