Hi Bill,
>> In general I think it's best for controls to do what they say they will
>> do and not have unexpected side effects.
> Fair comment. Perhaps it should say that it is going to do a mode switch
> as well, I'm not sure how it would do that though.
>
> The reason for the proposal was that I have never checked that box
> without also changing to JT9 mode and it seemed to me that that would
> always be the case.
Yes, probably so. But suppose I'm in JT65 mode, then check "+ 2 kHz"
which puts me into JT9 mode. Then I switch to JT4 mode, and then
uncheck the "+2 kHz" box. What mode should the program leave me in?
Yes, the program could keep track of such changes and make an educated
guess about what I want. But I might be happier to feel I was in
control of mode changes. I don't mind one extra click to select JT9 mode
after ticking "+2 kHz".
-- Joe
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
