Hi Mike,
On 5/11/2015 11:14 AM, Michael Black wrote:
> Since RRR is the 73 for the CQ side this is a simple patch that allows RRR
> to act the same as 73 for getting the log pop up window and advancing the
> Next button.
>
> Does this sound OK or are there other side effects?
In the recommended sequence of standard messages for JT65-JT4-JT9 QSOs,
I consider receipt of "RRR" from my QSO partner to be sufficient for
logging the QSO.
Your suggested patch goes one step further. You are suggesting that by
*transmitting* "RRR" to your QSO partner you have completed a minimal QSO.
What if your QSO partner fails to receive your "RRR" because of QSB,
QRM, or whatever? You'll be calling CQ again, while he/she is still
waiting for your "RRR". It's a busted QSO, or at least cause for
significant confusion.
You can (and should) make your own decision about when a QSO is complete
and should be logged. WSJT-X can remind you to log a QSO, when you're
clearly done; but it shouldn't make the decision for you, and certainly
not prematurely.
-- Joe, K1JT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
