Hi Joe,
Would it add too much complexity to have the frequency error correction in
the audio base band of the decoders? This would prevent having to re-tune
the rig and would also allow crystal controlled transceivers to also have
frequency error correction.
73, Edson PY2SDR
---
- We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together.
- Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se
trabalharmos juntos.
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of the fun things about WSPR is the frequency accuracies that
> are involved. Having WSPR mode in WSJT-X motivates some serious thought
> about how best to handle frequency calibration errors in transceivers.
>
> Typical dial readout errors in modern radios are a few parts per million
> -- for example, a 20 Hz error at 14 MHz. For JT65 or JT9 such
> discrepancies are not very important. But the WSPR sub-bands in
> conventional use since 2008 are only 200 Hz wide, and we'd like to use
> all of that range effectively. If my transceiver's dial reads 20 Hz
> low, and yours reads 20 Hz high, and we both set our dials to the
> conventional 14.0956 MHz for 20 meters, after setting our WSPR Tx
> frequencies at random within the 200 Hz sub-band there's something like
> a 20% chance that we won't decode one another.
>
> Earlier production versions of WSPR have handled these issues in a
> rather sophisticated way. The User's Guide includes detailed
> instructions for determining calibration constants for your transceiver
> using over-the-air signals (see Appendix C of
> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPR_3.0_User.pdf ). The
> resulting accuracies can be better than 1 Hz.
>
> If CAT control is in use and "Enable frequency correction" is ticked on
> WSPR's "Advanced Setup" window, frequencies sent to the radio are
> adjusted so as to compensate for the dial errors. For example, if
> 14.0956 MHz has been requested, the command for 14095620 Hz may be sent
> to the radio.
>
> I picture this being implemented in WSJT-X in a similar way. In this
> example, the radio dial would read 14.096520. I'm suggesting that the
> frequency readout on the WSJT-X screen would read 14.095600, the
> supposedly "true" frequency.
>
> Comments and suggestions would be welcome.
>
> -- 73, Joe, K1JT
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
