Hi Guys,

Here are my thoughts

1 Force users to calibrate on installing WSPR. 

2. Remind them evey 10 days or so to recalibrate

3 . Invite them to change the default TX frequency. This morning I have at 
least 6 stations on 7.040100 + or -2 Hz and only the strongest gets decoded


Keep up the good work

73

Victor



----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Taylor" <j...@princeton.edu>
To: "WSJT software development" <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 21:09 +0700
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Dial calibration errors

> A few more thoughts about dial calibration errors.
> 
> A couple of days ago I put my TS-2000 radio through the calibration 
> procedure described in Appendix C of the WSPR 4.0 User's Guide
> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPR_4.0_User.pdf
> 
> The procedure takes about half an hour, end to end, yielding the values 
> of two constants A and B.  These constants appear in the equation
> 
>   d = A + B*f
> 
> where d is the radio's dial error in Hz and f is the received frequency 
> in MHz.  In my case the constants are A = 2.14 Hz and B = 1.6254.  I 
> note that the value of A has remained constant, but several years ago B 
> was somewhat smaller (B = 1.2885 in 2011), so the master oscillator in 
> my TS-2000 has aged a bit.
> 
> From the values of A and B I computed the dial error for each amateur 
> band and entered those values (expressed in MHz) in the "Offset" column 
> of the WSJT-X Settings | Frequencies tab.  Frequencies reported for my 
> WSPR decodes now agree with those reported by Steve, K9AN, to within 1 
> Hz.  (Steve's receiver uses GPS-disciplined oscillators, so his WSPR 
> reports are a good standard for comparison.)
> 
> It might be handy to permit a user of WSJT-X to enter values for A and B 
> and have the program calculate the resulting "Offset" values for the 
> Frequencies tab.  The resulting system behavior is very sensible, in my 
> opinion.  When WSPRing on 20 meters, for example, my TS-2000 dial now 
> reads 14.09562 MHz.  WSJT-X intentionally sets the radio about 24 Hz 
> high on  this band, to compensate for its dial error.
> 
> The dial frequency displayed on the WSJT-X main window is the corrected 
> value, 14.095 600 MHz.
> 
>     -- 73, Joe, K1JT
> 
> On 5/13/2015 10:48 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > One of the fun things about WSPR is the frequency accuracies that
> > are involved.  Having WSPR mode in WSJT-X motivates some serious thought
> > about how best to handle frequency calibration errors in transceivers.
> >
> > Typical dial readout errors in modern radios are a few parts per million
> > -- for example, a 20 Hz error at 14 MHz.  For JT65 or JT9 such
> > discrepancies are not very important.  But the WSPR sub-bands in
> > conventional use since 2008 are only 200 Hz wide, and we'd like to use
> > all of that range effectively.  If my transceiver's dial reads 20 Hz
> > low, and yours reads 20 Hz high, and we both set our dials to the
> > conventional 14.0956 MHz for 20 meters, after setting our WSPR Tx
> > frequencies at random within the 200 Hz sub-band there's something like
> > a 20% chance that we won't decode one another.
> >
> > Earlier production versions of WSPR have handled these issues in a
> > rather sophisticated way.  The User's Guide includes detailed
> > instructions for determining calibration constants for your transceiver
> > using over-the-air signals (see Appendix C of
> > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSPR_3.0_User.pdf ).  The
> > resulting accuracies can be better than 1 Hz.
> >
> > If CAT control is in use and  "Enable frequency correction" is ticked on
> > WSPR's "Advanced Setup" window, frequencies sent to the radio are
> > adjusted so as to compensate for the dial errors.  For example, if
> > 14.0956 MHz has been requested, the command for 14095620 Hz may be sent
> > to the radio.
> >
> > I picture this being implemented in WSJT-X in a similar way.  In this
> > example, the radio dial would read 14.096520.  I'm suggesting that the
> > frequency readout on the WSJT-X screen would read 14.095600, the
> > supposedly "true" frequency.
> >
> > Comments and suggestions would be welcome.
> >
> >     -- 73, Joe, K1JT
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> > Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> > Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> > Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> > http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> > _______________________________________________
> > wsjt-devel mailing list
> > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to