Hi Steve,

Sorry to be slow in getting back to you.  After my post about wsprd_exp 
I got involved in chasing a bug in the ISCAT decoder ...

On 6/26/2015 12:31 PM, Steven Franke wrote:
> I’m glad to see that you were able to confirm the improved performance
> of the two-pass decoder. I’m guessing that your dataset includes a more
> representative mixture of bands and conditions than the group of
> 20m files that I used. Hence the smaller, but still significant,
> increase in the number of decodes over the default wsprd.

Probably so.  I thought the increased number of decodes was very 
worthwhile, anyway.

> I am surprised by your observation that the two-pass decoder is faster
> than the default one. That’s not what I see here. Are you using your
> wspr_timer.out times? Or some other measure of execution time?
> The numbers that I reported were the “Total” times from wspr_timer.out.

I ran both tests a couple of times, and I also used the “Total” times 
from wspr_timer.out.  However, I was concentrating on decoder 
performance rather than timing, so my observation needs a more careful 
look before being taken very seriously.  I hope to find time to look at 
it more thoroughly next week, and maybe see if any further optimizations 
are possible.

Are you comfortable with making wsprd_exp the "official" wsprd now ?

        -- Joe

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors 
network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms 
for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to