Hi Mike,
interesting discussion.
Some days ago i received in JT65+JT9 mode the follow:
call1 call2 RR73
It is transmitted to pskreporter as locator of call2 as RR73
RR73 is a valid locator, witch is my misunderstanding ?
73
Sandro
IW3RAB
Il 08/07/2015 19:13, Michael Black ha scritto:
> I'd like to propose this patch. I do believe it's completely harmless
> to all other operations.
>
> All it does is allow RR73 to be detected as a Log request. One less
> mouse click for every QSO initiated.
>
> @@ -62,7 +63,7 @@
>
> bool message_is_73 (int type, QStringList const& msg_parts)
>
> {
>
> return type >= 0
>
> - && ((type < 6 && msg_parts.contains ("73"))
>
> + && ((type < 6 && (msg_parts.contains ("73") || msg_parts.contains
> ("RR73")))
>
> || (type == 6 && !msg_parts.filter ("73").isEmpty ()));
>
> }
>
> }
>
> 73
>
> Mike W9MDB
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
> GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
> you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
> Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
> https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud.
GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that
you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business.
Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today.
https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
