What kind of time is it taking now? The overhead of splitting the work can kill any advantage as I'm sure you know from the previous multi-threading of JT9.
Mike W9MDB On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > Hi all, > > Some further information on the new Reed Solomon decoder. > > A simple timing measurement shows that for test program "rsdtest" 97% of > the execution time is spent in the Berlekamp-Massey > errors-and-erasures decoder. > > This is good. It means that if/when we decide more speed is desirable, > it should be easy to get it. For an N-CPU machines, N-1 parallel > threads can be used to execute the randomized-erasures loop. > > Extending the number of trials from 10^4 to 10^5 increases the number of > decodes from 837 to 880. Still no false decodes. > > I posted a plot here > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/decodes_vs_ntrials.pdf > showing the cumulative number of decodes (out of 1000 simulated data > sets) as a function of ntrials. > > -- Joe, K1JT > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
