Bill, how about the attached to eliminate duplicate status updates? This isn't tested. Seems like it should do the job.
Do any of these need initialization (QStrings???) 73 Mike W9MDB On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Bill Somerville <[email protected]> wrote: > On 24/12/2015 20:46, Laurie, VK3AMA wrote: > > These Status packets are being sent when there is NO change in status. > > - What is the purpose of these status packets sent at the 50 seconds > (just prior to decode processing it appears)? > - What is the purpose of sending a second duplicate status packet just > after the first packet? > > Hi Laurie, > > as I said we do not check for redundant status updates. I will have a scan > through the code and see if any can be easily eliminated but checking for > every field against previous values may be quite tricky. WSJT-X is largely > event driven and redundant events happen all the time because of the way > that GUI event loop messages are generated. > > 73 > Bill > G4WJS. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > >
statusupdate.patch
Description: Binary data
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
