On 10/03/2016 19:07, Bill Somerville wrote: >> Am I missing something here? Is there a good reason to have implemented >> >subroutine jt4_average as a callback, when all it does is write a few >> >items out to file avemsg.txt? >> > >> >I've presently done the equivalent things for JT65 by simply writing the >> >desired info to logical unit 14, without using a callback. > Hi Joe, > > I used a callback as I assumed that the implementation when called from > wsjtx directly would not use a file at all but pass averaging results > directly to the GUI, similarly to decode results. If that is not going > to be the case then maybe a callback isn't required. Hi Joe,
I forgot to say that it does not matter which way it is done for now and probably best using the file until the arguments that are delivered by an averaging result have settled down with a more stable version. I am happy to convert to a callback implementation later when the next phase of the wsjtx and jt9 merging is done. 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
