Didn't know about that option....will do. Just tested it on the signalmeter
patch but it produced identical output for that one.It may have been my
hand-editing to remove other extraneous things that messed it up. de Mike W9MDB
From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com>
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, March 4, 2017 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Cumulative patch
On 04/03/2017 20:04, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Mike --
>
> The file you posted as "signalmeter2.patch" appears not to be what you
> intended. It's a diff (or possibly a fragment of a diff) taken from the
> ../wsjtx/doc directory ??
Hi Mike,
further to that I had an issue with the last patch you sent. I have
sorted it out but in future if you use `svn diff` to generate patches
you should do the following:
1) Ensure you are at the root of your client workspace (this is probably
the issue Joe is reporting),
2) Add the --patch-compatible option to the `svn diff` command to ensure
that correctly formatted unified do-f file is generated (svn uses a
non-standard format so it can include property changes - for the
majority of patches there will be no property changes).
3) Check the content before posting -- hi hi.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
