Just trying to confirm what set/subset of messages each of these should have.
I wanted to include the same "expected" results in all of them and wanted to 
know if any added messages should be added to any of them

So sounds like JT4 need the same added messages as JT65/JT9.  MSK144 and QRA64 
are good as-is.Have I got that right?  de Mike W9MDB
      From: Bill Somerville <[email protected]>
 To: [email protected] 
 Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Test messages
   
 On 27/04/2017 17:14, Black Michael wrote:
  
 I'd like to make all the "code" testers do what they are capable of or 
expected to do and agree where possible. 
  
 Hi Mike, I'm not quite sure what you are asking here? All the protocols in 
WSJT-X except ISCAT use a similar, but not exactly the same, message language. 
Modes used on EME will include some form of short codes, JT4 uses a single tone 
for RO, RRR and 73 and probably for "I'm here" in a sked. JT65 EME usage (which 
doesn't use SNR based reports) allows for short codes (alternating pair of 
tones) for RO, RRR and 73. OOO messages are reduced to the same message without 
the OOO which is superfluous.
  MSK144 has two special forms, short codes sent as shorter messages with 
hashed callsigns using a different encoding and contest style replies that use 
antipodal grids (only in the message -- the decoder shifts them back to the 
real grid). With QRA64 the AP system negates the need for short code messages 
completely because sensitivity increases as the QSO progresses. 73
 Bill
 G4WJS.
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! 
http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel


   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to