Hi David,
I believe that would generate some nasty side effects.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 05/07/2017 22:10, David Tiller wrote:
Any chance of having the CW id run concurrently with a data packet, perhaps at
fDial + 100 Hz or so? It'd meet the id requirement without interfering with
QSOs.
On Jul 5, 2017, at 14:42, Gary McDuffie <mcduf...@ag0n.net> wrote:
On Jul 4, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Steve Huston <hus...@srhuston.net> wrote:
I did notice that having "CW ID after 73" turned on didn't work well
in that mode - I would get W2 out before it would change to the next
part of the sequence and stop. I unchecked it for now.
Since it takes 13.4 something seconds just to send the data package out one
time, that only leaves about 1.5 seconds for your ID, not including turnover
time. Just turn it off. If the period were extended to finish the ID, you
would not decode the other station on the next turnover because you would miss
quite a bit of the early part of the data from him.
At least that is my understanding of the facts. Someone please correct me if
I’m wrong. New to the group.
Gary-AG0N
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
