Thank you all for the clarification!
73,
/Heimir W1ANT
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:05 AM Richard Lamont <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/07/17 15:50, Heimir Sverrisson wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I know this is a peripheral to the software development, but I decided to
> > ask anyway.
> > I had a handful of successful QSO's using FT8 on Saturday. When uploading
> > the log using TQSL it said that FT8 was an illegal mode and asked if I
> > wanted to upload the log anyway, which I did. My QSO count on LOTW went
> up
> > subsequently but I've not seen any matches.
> > Is anyone looking into this at this point or is there anything I can do
> to
> > follow up with the issue with other parties, as I am sure that people
> will
> > want this whole chain to fuction.
>
> I imagine ARRL will add FT8 to the TQSL config.xml file fairly soon,
> just as they did with QRA64 and MSK144 in March.
>
> Until then, you can map FT8 to a generic "DATA" mode in TQSL. I've had
> several FT8 QSOs matched by LoTW this way.
>
> TQSL File->Display or Modify Preferences->ADIF Modes->Add
>
> In the ADIF Mode window add "FT8"
> In the Resulting TQSL mode window select DATA.
>
> 73,
> Richard G4DYA
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
