Hi Mike Well, i've made some QSOs already even with the prefix stripped off in report messages, but I have had to double click the caller to start off autoseq. Then autoseq progresses OK except it doesn't send a 73 message.
Would the patch applied at my end at least get autoseq replying to a caller to my CQ. If so, I will try it - please send me the link again as that email is not on my pc here. Charlie > I think you'll find compound signs flat don't work in autoseq and won't > work until both sides have the patched version to fix it.And everybody is > using autoseq. > Problem is the standard messages strip the prefix/suffix and you end up > with callsigns that don't match on both sides in subsequent messages. > Patching one side only fixed the one side...the other side still has the > same problem...doesn't matter which side you're on. > CQ W9MDB/QRPW9MDB G4WJS IO91 -- my callsign doesn't match and won't > progress... > CQ G4WJS IO91G4WJS W9MDB/QRPW9MDB G4WJS -01 -- my callsign doesn't match > nowG4WJS W9MDB R-01 -- and it doesn't match on his side either > Catch 22. Â I think you can progress on your side by double clicking but > the other side probably won't do that and wonder why autoseq isn't > working. > > de Mike W9MDB > > From: "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > To: Black Michael <[email protected]>; WSJT software development > <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 10:28 AM > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and type 1 prefix in my call > > Thanks, Mike > > Just have be quick on the mouse then! > > Charlie > >> Yes...problem is you need the patch on both sides.So until the next >> release candidate is out compound signs aren't a good idea. >> de Mike W9MDB >> >> >>Â Â Â From: "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >>Â To: [email protected] >>Â Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 10:16 AM >>Â Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 and type 1 prefix in my call >> >> Hi All >> >> Testing FT8 from HA land this afternoon as HA/G3WDG on 20m. >> >> I have 'call 1st' ticked but autoseq is not responding to callers to my >> CQ. >> >> Was this what Mike's patch was supposed to correct?ÃÂ I have not yet >> tried >> his patch. >> >> 73 >> >> Charlie >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> >> >>Â Â >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! >> http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! > http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
