Hi Dave,

 

OK, thanks for clearing that up. I knew something wasn’t straight forward, but 
could not recall what it was. The resubmission part is what was missing.

 

Thanks

 

Greg

 

From: Dave AA6YQ [mailto:aa...@ambersoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:01 PM
To: 'WSJT software development' <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] TQSL's config.xml

 

>>>AA6YQ comments below

 

From: Greg Beam [mailto:ki7m...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 2:02 PM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] TQSL's config.xml

 

Hi Dave,

 

Thanks. I recall--vaguely--there being some issue with using this method before 
LoTW implements the mode. I don’t recall what it was offhand. Something to the 
affect that, once you’ve created the map, you (or LoTW) cannot go back and 
change it in the event the mapping we select locally differs from the 
server-side implementation. 

 

>>>That’s not correct. When LoTW accepts FT8 QSOs directly, you can remove the 
>>>automatic mapping to DATA from TQSL. At that point in time, it would be 
>>>polite to resubmit your FT8 QSOs to LoTW so that QSO partners pursuing an 
>>>FT8 WAS endorsement (if one is introduced) will get the “exact mode matches” 
>>>they need.

 

    73,

 

            Dave, AA6YQ 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to