> On Jul 26, 2017, at 7:34 AM, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote:
>
> I am not offering any clear solution here but hopefully you will understand
> that the suggested working frequencies have been discussed and analysed for
> the best compromise before being added to the WSJT-X application. With
> respect to all the suggested FT8 working frequencies and the proposed changes
> on 80m to allow JA operators to join in, nothing is final, we have not made a
> full general availability release of WSJT-X including FT8 yet. If the band
> planners and coordinators have better suggestions we will comply. We have
> done this on 6m in an attempt to have common international working
> frequencies despite the region one data mode allocations being considered as
> unworkable by many operators in other regions.
And none of the frequencies has been “hard coded” as stated in the OP’s note.
Gary - AG0N
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
