----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > two more problems which have been spotted during the WSJT-X package > Fedora review [1] and I think it's worth to report upstream: > > - GUIcontrols.txt, prefixes.txt, wsjtx_changelog.txt all have CR + LF > line endings > - jt9 binary has executable stack I meant this: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Roadmap/ExecutableStacks not that the binary itself is executable / running
73! Jaroslav, OK2JRQ > > 73! Jaroslav, OK2JRQ > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487776 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > FYI, WSJT-X Fedora review request: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487776 > > > > I am attaching patch which I had to use. I think it could be beneficial > > for other distros as well, so please consider it's inclusion upstream > > (it shouldn't break the current behavior), it does the following: > > > > - it makes Boost_NO_SYSTEM_PATHS user settable, allowing users to compile > > with the system boost *1) > > - it makes hamlib_STATIC user settable, allowing user to link dynamically > > with the hamlib *2) > > - it allows compilation with the stock (i.e. not forked hamlib) *3) > > - it allows compilation with the boost version 1.60 *4) > > > > *1) In Fedora (and probably in other distro's as well) it's not allowed > > to bundle, everything needs to be compiled with the system libraries and > > system headers, so having support upstream for such approach would be > > great. > > > > *2) In Fedora (and probably others) it's not allowed to statically link, > > so having switch for dynamic linking would also help. > > > > *3) In Fedora due to *1) and *2) we cannot use the forked hamlib. > > So I think it would be beneficial to support compilation with both > > versions of hamlib. I.e. forked hamlib - full functionality, non-forked > > hamlib - limited functionality, but no compilation errors or third party > > patching needed. > > > > *4) I would like to introduce the wsjtx package to older Fedora versions > > as well. I tried and it compiled OK with the boost 1.60 and so far it > > also seems to work OK with it, so maybe 1.60 is enough. > > > > 73! Jaroslav, OK2JRQ > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > RR, good idea! -- Joe, K1JT > > > > > > On 8/31/2017 7:31 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > > Hi Joe, > > > > > > > > thanks for info. I have WSJT-X packaging on my todo list, but I didn't > > > > know > > > > that it completely superseded WSPR-X. But no problem, I will probaly > > > > close > > > > the WSPR-X inclusion request and will open new one for WSJT-X > > > > > > > > 73! Jaroslav, OK2JRQ > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > >> Hi Jaroslav, > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for your email. I wish I could have saved you the effort > > > >> already > > > >> put into this task, because I do not recommend packaging WSPR-X for > > > >> any > > > >> platform or distribution. WSPR-X is obsolete, and no longer > > > >> supported. > > > >> Its functions are limited, and anyway now much better served by > > > >> WSJT-X. > > > >> > > > >> -- 73, Joe, K1JT > > > >> > > > >> On 8/31/2017 5:39 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > > > >>> Hi, > > > >>> > > > >>> I am trying to get WSPR-X into Fedora [1]. > > > >>> > > > >>> During the packaging I have found few issues: > > > >>> > > > >>> - I had to apply the attached patch in order to compile the > > > >>> code under Fedora, otherwise it wanted to link with the palir-02.dll > > > >>> > > > >>> - in the SVN few source files had executable permission set > > > >>> > > > >>> - files in SVN have mixed line endings, most of the files have LF, > > > >>> but there are also files with CR + LF ending > > > >>> > > > >>> - I wasn't sure which version the WSPR-X is, for the SVN revision > > > >>> 8046 the GUI app shows 0.9, but there is written 1.3 in the > > > >>> CMakeLists.txt, so I marked it as SVN snapshot after the 0.9 release. > > > >>> > > > >>> - during the build it created empty /usr/bin/kvasd file, so I didn't > > > >>> package it > > > >>> > > > >>> - the provided icon is very small (only 32 x 32 pixels), it would > > > >>> be great to have 128 x 128 pixels PNG at least. If you don't have > > > >>> resources to create it, I think our design team could help > > > >>> > > > >>> - it's missing .desktop file, I created one (in attachment) > > > >>> > > > >>> 73! Jaroslav, OK2JRQ > > > >>> > > > >>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487419 > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > > >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > >>> wsjt-devel mailing list > > > >>> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > > _______________________________________________ > > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
