There was a discussion in a Google group about valid prefixes and suffixes that can be used in JT65 - and by the JT65-HB9HQX software.
'jt65code.exe -t' lists all possible variations. Prefix 'A000' to 'ZZZZ' should be possible and they will work by testing them with jt65code.exe. Valid prefixes are listed in the http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/JT65.pdf document, some 4 char prefixes starting with a digit, or for example, per list 'VK9M' showing other results with jt65code.exe and tested in WSJT-X 1.7 devel 8164 But "CQ 3D3R/OE1MWW RH97" results in "CQ 3D3R/OE1MWW" the QRA locator is missing. If I just change it to "CQ AD3R/OE1MWW RH97" or "CQ ZD3R/OE1MWW RH97" it will be sent as typed. Otherwise, the listed VK9M in the JT65.pdf, using it with jt65code.exe gives me instead of "CQ VK9M/OE1MWW JN88" just "CQ VK9M/OE1MWW", the QRA locator is missing in this case. Replacing the '9' with an 'Z' for testing, will be coded as typed. All this is not important at the moment, just, which guideline should be used? 73 de Wolfgang OE1MWW ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
