Thanks for explaining your comment rules,  so I registered as proposed.

73, Charly
 

My personal comment again:

Hello,

I use WSJT-x in ist various versions since abt 2 years and have seen many changes and improvements and for sure, I appreciate all the efforts put in such a complex software. 
I did not experience any major faults or bugs - and had very few situation where the system was frozen.

However, personally I am not really pleased with one of the modifications introduced in 1.8 RC3.

I personally prefer the frequency settings (split or locked) in FT8 and other modes as it was programmed up to V1.8 RC2.
>From my point of view, split operation (over here) is only needed during ES openings whe we see with big pile up. Outside ES the majority of VHF/UHF users seem to  operate "simplex"
I guess there are 50:50 pro and contra - so I take is "as is".

What I like to have added to WSJT.-x   when updating the software is more important for me (and others?) :

a) Many european users have likely build up their own frequency tables, adjusted to reflect the national restrictions in Europe (mainly on 4m and 6m - but also on other VHF/UHF bands)

Every update (or reset) re-creates the default frequency tables. An option NOT to override existing databases would be really helpful.

I have not found a way how to save and/or restore my personal frequency table to avoid a manual recreation of that table after every update. 

Thanks for reading
73,
Charly, DF5VAE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to