It took me a few days to get it the way I wanted it but I like it way better.
Jim S. N2ADV -----Original Message----- From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:27 AM To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.9.0 rc2 Waterfall On 07/03/2018 16:21, Ron Schwartz wrote: > The 1.9.0 rc2 waterfall now appears ‘smeared’ and weak traces are not > as visible as earlier versions (see attached). Is this an intentional > change? Hi Ron, it has been changed, the intent was to improve the visibility of weak signals. Please try adjusting the sliders to your liking. Once you get what appears to be a good trace try playing back the recorded .WAV file in version v1.8.0 with your old settings and compare. If you still think the new waterfall is worse please send us the .WAV file. 73 Bill G4WJS. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
