Hi Roger I confirm your findings.
73 Charlie G3WDG > Here I find the following: > > When jt49sim is commanded to produce a jt4 wave file it produces a jt9 > wave file, e.g. the command: > > jt49sim "K1ABC W9XYZ EN37" 4C 1 0.0 0.0 1 -15 > > produces a JT9C wave file instead of the expected JT4C wave file, even > though the console message says that a JT4 wave file is being created: > > ===============console message follows================ > > C:\JTSDK\wsjtx\garc\qt52\1.9.0\Release\install\bin>jt49sim "K1ABC W9XYZ > EN37" 4C 1 0.0 0.0 1 -15 > File Sig   Freq Mode  S/N  DT  Dop   Message > ------------------------------------------------------------ >   1  1 1000.000 4C -15.0 0.00  0.0 K1ABC W9XYZ EN37 > > ===============end of console message================ > > The wave file produced is a JT9 wave file: > http://w3sz.com/JT4C-Original.wav > > So whether the specified mode is "4" or "9", a JT9 mode wave file is > always produced. > > This is so with version 1.9.0-rc4 r8642 from directory > C:\JTSDK\wsjtx\garc\qt52\1.9.0\Release\build (which I copied to > ..Release\install\bin) > > compiled locally using JTSDK 2.0.6-0 Release r715. > > This is true for all sub-modes JT4A-G. > > I thought that the likely culprit causing this problem was line 56 in > jt49sim.f90, "imode = 9" which is placed right before the imode "if" > statement, which you can see here: > https://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/wsjt/8642/tree/tags/wsjtx-1.9.0-rc4/lib/jt49sim.f90 > > I suspect that this line was accidentally left in place after it was > added during debugging. > > Removing line 56 ("imode = 9") and recompiling corrects the problem so > that JT4 files are produced by the "4" option and JT9 files are produced > by the "9" option. A wave file created using the same command line as > was given above, but after the correction to the code as just described, > is here: > http://w3sz.com/JT4C-Corrected.wav > > 73, > > Roger Rehr > W3SZ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel