Bill I use HRD for logging/rig control and this is what I saved with ADIF
Master from my log. I use other FT8 software a lot and this meant many qso`s
were not in WSJTX and I had previously trimmed down my HRD log with master and
replaced the ADI file with this but I noticed I had left fields in that were
not in what WSJTX saves. What is in this attachment is same as what WSJTX saves
just out of order. Do you see any problems with this format before I proceed to
make a new replacement. Also it would be a big help to include a "worked B4"
filter in what is processed by WSJTX. I was on 20M this AM and several 77 bit
stations on from EU I was able to work most but I would keep clicking on
stations I had just worked most annoying to not have some way to
distinguish/eliminate B4`s. Thank you for your helpMorris WA4MIT
<BAND:3>20m <CALL:6>5XXXXX <COMMENT:13>TU best 73 GL <FREQ:9>14.076878
<GRIDSQUARE:6>JK13bm <MODE:3>FT8 <MY_GRIDSQUARE:6>EM63eh <OPERATOR:6>WA4MIT
<RST_RCVD:3>-13 <RST_SENT:3>-24 <STATION_CALLSIGN:6>WA4MIT <TIME_OFF:6>154100
<TIME_ON:6>154000 <TX_PWR:6>35.000 <QSO_DATE:8>20181127 <EOR>
On Tuesday, November 27, 2018, 5:09:09 PM CST, Bill Somerville
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Morris,
the order of fields in an ADIF record doesn't matter. The outstanding issue
with WSJT-X v2.0.0 RC5 is that it doesn't interpret ADIF record contents
case-insensitively when it could and should. For example at least one logging
application writes the BAND ADIF field in upper case rather than the ADIF
specified lowercase, i.e. 80M instead of 80m. WSJT-X should not treat 80M and
80m as different but currently it does. It is an easy fix that is already
coded, I just need some confirmations from users, who are seeing issues with
needed per band highlighting that they are using ADIF exports from other
logging applications in wsjtx_log.adi .
If you are seeing this issue I can send you a patched version of WSJT-X to
test.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
On 27/11/2018 22:58, Morris Wideman via wsjt-devel wrote:
Bill if one were to import from a logging program would the order of the
fields matter if we used something like ADIF Master to par the ADI fields down
to the same as that WSJT-X saves just in a different order.
Thanks 73 Morris WA4MIT
On Tuesday, November 27, 2018, 3:50:28 PM CST, Bill Somerville
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 27/11/2018 21:30, Al wrote:
Note below the change in color for GW4HDR after I called him the first time..
Note also that even though I had just worked N8TCP, now colored for new
call...
Hi Al,
there is one outstanding issue in the highlighting that I am aware of, it is
related to imported ADIF log files. Have you used an export from some logging
application to replace the wsjtx_log.adi file?
73
Bill
G4WJS.
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
