Bill I use HRD for logging/rig control and this is what I saved with ADIF Master from my log. I use other FT8 software a lot and this meant many qso`s were not in WSJTX and I had previously trimmed down my HRD log with master and replaced the ADI file with this but I noticed I had left fields in that were not in what WSJTX saves. What is in this attachment is same as what WSJTX saves just out of order. Do you see any problems with this format before I proceed to make a new replacement. Also it would be a big help to include a "worked B4" filter in what is processed by WSJTX. I was on 20M this AM and several 77 bit stations on from EU I was able to work most but I would keep clicking on stations I had just worked most annoying to not have some way to distinguish/eliminate B4`s. Thank you for your helpMorris WA4MIT <BAND:3>20m <CALL:6>5XXXXX <COMMENT:13>TU best 73 GL <FREQ:9>14.076878 <GRIDSQUARE:6>JK13bm <MODE:3>FT8 <MY_GRIDSQUARE:6>EM63eh <OPERATOR:6>WA4MIT <RST_RCVD:3>-13 <RST_SENT:3>-24 <STATION_CALLSIGN:6>WA4MIT <TIME_OFF:6>154100 <TIME_ON:6>154000 <TX_PWR:6>35.000 <QSO_DATE:8>20181127 <EOR> On Tuesday, November 27, 2018, 5:09:09 PM CST, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote: Hi Morris, the order of fields in an ADIF record doesn't matter. The outstanding issue with WSJT-X v2.0.0 RC5 is that it doesn't interpret ADIF record contents case-insensitively when it could and should. For example at least one logging application writes the BAND ADIF field in upper case rather than the ADIF specified lowercase, i.e. 80M instead of 80m. WSJT-X should not treat 80M and 80m as different but currently it does. It is an easy fix that is already coded, I just need some confirmations from users, who are seeing issues with needed per band highlighting that they are using ADIF exports from other logging applications in wsjtx_log.adi . If you are seeing this issue I can send you a patched version of WSJT-X to test. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 27/11/2018 22:58, Morris Wideman via wsjt-devel wrote: Bill if one were to import from a logging program would the order of the fields matter if we used something like ADIF Master to par the ADI fields down to the same as that WSJT-X saves just in a different order. Thanks 73 Morris WA4MIT On Tuesday, November 27, 2018, 3:50:28 PM CST, Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> wrote: On 27/11/2018 21:30, Al wrote: Note below the change in color for GW4HDR after I called him the first time.. Note also that even though I had just worked N8TCP, now colored for new call... Hi Al, there is one outstanding issue in the highlighting that I am aware of, it is related to imported ADIF log files. Have you used an export from some logging application to replace the wsjtx_log.adi file? 73 Bill G4WJS.
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel