On 29Dec 2018, at 06:11, Claude Frantz <claude.fra...@bayern-mail.de> wrote: > > Considering that the ADIF spec is imprecise concerning the admissible values > of the RST_RCVD and RST_SENT fields, I prefer to avoid conflicts with some > sites and programs, using only values corresponding to the regular > expression [1-5][1-9][1-9]? in these fields. Therefore I have to convert. > Rather than using S9 as a reference, I'm using S1, initially defined as > "Faint—signals barely perceptible" and I consider it as corresponding to -28 > dB S/N. I calculate the S level according to this own definition. I consider > R fixed at 5 and T fixed at 9. A good idea ? Hmm…
What logging software are you using? ADIF version 3.0.9 defines RST_SENT and RST_RCVD as a string which is “signal report sent to the contacted station” and “signal report from the contacted station”. I move my FT8 contacts from wsjt-x to my logging software, which is the DXLab Suite. DXKeeper has no problem handling the db numbers and signs from wsjt-x that are included in the ADIF log file signal report fields that I import. This seems to be a lot better choice than to try to create a non-standard signal report arrangement that nothing will understand. Hope this helps. 73, John K8AJS jbast...@me.com _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
