Hi all.
Let me disagree for FT8, absolutely. It’s not a problem in RTTY, but not in FT8.
Due to the hurry at fixed slots and the psychological relevancy of the thing.
Over the second or third DUPE in a row I would leave in normal conditions.
BTW I’d never given up with a DUPE for several simple reasons, one is that him
could have taken wrong my call.
But even if to me it seems not polite leave DUPE unanswered I am pretty sure
that there are bunch of peoples that think differently.
At last, historically Contest is NO-DUPE, out of etiquette and personal
behaviour.
Logger, if WSJT/FT8 is a logger, means NO-DUPE. Not only beaming and so on.
It would also mean, logger, score calculation and more, more, more.
That, WSJT/FT8, is no more than a heavy effort external engine to a definitive
logger.
MMMTTY, 2Tone and even GRITTY are much more well integrated into loggers. Even
using those all together.
I would work any dupe in RTTY, I used that. When I know is a DUPE. I would’t
like AFTER to find more and more dupes in a row.
Also, last but not least, DUPEs are ISO in RTTY not in FT8, usually. That’s
another why as to workout anyone in RTTY, DUPE or not.
From my standpoint it is not a score problem, the SCORE is calculated by the
Contest Committee. Here locally it’s just speculation.
CU in RU
73 & HNY de iw1ayd Salvo
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:37:22 -0600
> From: Ron Koenig <[email protected]>
> To: WSJT software development <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Roundup : Raw v adjudicated scores
> Message-ID:
> <capqmqnfsm-r9f79jywo6nz2rnyklsiqnx6qms_hobbywkh7...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dupes are faster to work than to try and not work them..
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018, 11:03 AM OG55W <[email protected] wrote:
>
>> Some operators do not lof without 73/73 or even 73/73/73.
>> Contest stations knpw that R/RR is OK QSO
>>
>> That can be one reason for not in log.
>>
>> 73 Keijo OG55W
>>
>>
>> -----Alkuper?inen viesti-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2018 6:40 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Roundup : Raw v adjudicated scores
>>
>> I had a brief look at the first 95 stations in FT8 Roundup results,
>> comparing raw to adjudicated scores.
>>
>> The failed QSO rate is about 9%.
>>
>> Best was 0.3% , average 9.1% and worst 41.7%.
>>
>> HNY to all!
>>
>> Charlie G3WDG
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wsjt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>
> ------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
