The post has NOT been removed, just the links to the software On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 11:47 AM Tom Melvin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All > > Don’t want to get into a protected discussion on this as I suspect the Dev > list is not suitable for some of it. > > Take the automatic QSO Mod (I thought JTDX did that already) out of the > equation, there are a couple of other features I saw in the posting that > could be incorporated into the mainstream release: > > Filter to exclude some prefixes - perhaps a local always on (JTDX Robot), > want to filter, great add the callsign to a filter list, supports (simple) > wildcard, want to ignore all Scotland, for example, add GM* - They won’t > appear. > > Noise issues - filter station above and below a certain Db reports. > > Can’t cope with the colour settings, can display new calls only - filter > out worked before to narrow down the ‘hit’ list. > > Those three I can see being helpful and useful. > > While I am against the Auto CQ option - would like to point out - the > station posting on QRZ is European, in the UK at least, extract from > Licence: > > 10(1) The Licensee may conduct Unattended Operation of Radio Equipment > provided that any such operation is consistent with the terms of this > Licence. Additional restrictions which apply to the Unattended Operation of > Beacons are specified in Schedule 2 to this Licence. > > > > So in some parts of the world it’s legal, In looking at schedule 2 - I > would watch calling WSPR a beacon. UK licence excludes any form of beacons > between 3.6Mhz and 28Mhz - even then the 80m and 10m bands it is only for > DF hunting. Basically 4m upwards with a pile of other restrictions is ok - > So any form of WSPR on HF is (as far as I can tell - would love to be > corrected) illegal if its called a beacon. > > Tom > > P.S. I don’t like censorship so if the QRZ post has been removed it is a > little worrying at what else are we not being told - It may be against FCC > regs but not all of us are governed by them. > > > -- > 73’s > > Tom > GM8MJV (IO85) > > > > > > On 30 Mar 2019, at 15:23, Topher Petty <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's not only against the spirit of Amateur Radio, but it's also against > FCC rules regarding unattended operation. FT8 is NOT a beacon, and doesn't > fall under those rules. > > Anyone who uses this deserves to be flogged repeatedly with a wet noodle, > and, if they're in the States, fined to the fullest extent of the > regulations. > > WSPR is a beacon, FT8 is not. This pisses me off to no end. > > de AI8W, Chris > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:28 PM Tag Loomis <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry, but some [expletive deleted] released an Auto CQ and Auto >> Responder mod to WSJT-X >> >> https://forums.qrz.com/index.php?threads/wsjt-x-full-auto-mod.652050/ >> >> I know there’s not much to be done about it, but man this makes me mad! >> >> >> -Stephen ‘Tag’ Loomis / N0TTL >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
