On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:11:41PM -0400, Joe Taylor wrote:
> We really do not need further advice on this topic, or a lecture about good
> UI practice, or code to undo the obviously intentional changes we made.

Joe, the patch was not necessarily for you.  It was for others that might be
packaging the software or for those likewise frustrated.  You and Bill were
clear in that this was intended behavior.

Bill, I'm replying on-list so that others can join a constructive
discussion.  There's no sense in shutting away a discussion when the
community wants to talk about it.

For this reason, I also object to removal of my message from the mailing
list archive.

For those interested, generation of this patch is trivial.  One merely needs
to copy the logqso.cpp, .h and .ui files from version 2.0.1.

> I'm sure you must understand what our purpose has been.  Similarly, we
> understand all of the reasons why you (and others) do not like it.  We don't
> like it, either; but we decided to try it anyway.

Joe, you're throwing the baby out with the bathwater here.  I understand you
see automation as undesirable, and that's fine.  But to sacrifice usability
of the software doesn't make sense, since any third party can just apply
their own automation patches.

As to attempts to discredit wsjtx, those certainly don't make sense to me.
You made your product and its great.  Preventing people from abusing it
shouldn't be your focus.  And its not even possible since the code is open.
This whole thing is a giant distraction.

These kind of heavy-handed changes and heavy-handed moderation don't help
the community.

Lastly, I'll appeal again to not destroy the accessibility of the dialog for
those needing assistance.  Software like screenreaders and voice command are
needed by some to operate GUI software.  Having people frustrate that
software with code and comments like

  // randomize accessible name of buttons

must be quite disheartening when one sees that it was done purposefully.

Regards.

-Chris K2CR

-- 
Chris K2CR
[email protected]



_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to